Comments on: The Official Biography of Diego

By: arbri

arbri — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:43:27 +0000

is wery good diego !

By: JP

JP — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:00:42 +0000

Another option is to play Giovinco up front in the 4-3-1-2 alongside Amauri. Del Piero is getting old and won’t play every game. I’m not too fond of Amauri/Iaquinta combination so playing Gio next to either of them could be the answer so Gio and Diego can play together.

By: Anthony

Anthony — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:12:43 +0000

Secco has improved, but where I think he still went wrong this year was spending 24 million on Diego instead of investing in the defense. We have Giovinco, so its not like we were in desperate need for Diego…although its still great to have a player like him available. Diego is a fantastic, but we could have used that money to sign a world class defender instead of bringing back Cannavaro. We would have had money left over too since I’m sure most defenders wouldn’t cost 24 million…so the extra money could have gone to sign a RB or help with the D’Ago deal. But if the D’Ago deal goes through (without losing vital players) and we sign Grosso…then I’ll definitely give kudos to Secco for a much improved mercato. Too bad Genoa used their co-ownership option on Criscito though…would have been nice to have him back…then we wouldn’t need Grosso.

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:24:34 +0000

haha…totally agree Alessio…

By: alessio

alessio — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:45:20 +0000

7.5mil in, at least, for co-ownership. Secco did wisely to put his co-ownership price high.

14mil sounds like a good idea, 20 seems high. Throw in Paolucci to drop it 2-3, and co-ownership of one of our other young players. (Not the 3 Musketeers) Then it’ll be 15 or so, with players to compensate for his departure. D’Agostino is worth it, he would add a whole new dimension to our team and he is a class player. Getting Diarra instead of D’Agostino would be a disaster! GET IT DONE SECCO!!!

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:23:44 +0000

crap..

By: alex

alex — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:17:09 +0000

http://www.tuttomercatoweb.com/napoli/?action=read&idnotizia=35588

genoa have the best transfer policy in italy. although they will miss thiago motta

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:10:02 +0000

il club bianconero offre 14 mln di euro mentre quello friulano ne vuole 20.

20 seems a little extreme..

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:08:54 +0000

E’ terminato con un nulla di fatto l’incontro tra l’Udinese e la Juventus per D’Agostino. Le parti, riporta ‘SkySport24′, restano infatti molto distanti (l’Udinese scende massimo a 18 mln di euro, la Juventus offre sui 14 mln di euro) tanto che il ds Alessio Secco sarebbe orientato verso altri obiettivi, Diarra in primis. Non è da escludere, tuttavia, un nuovo vertice tra i due club nei prossimi giorni per il mediano palermitano

By: alessio

alessio — Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:27:42 +0000

Palladino, Mirante, and Lanzafame’s co-ownership deals have been renewed and they will be staying at their respective clubs. No word on Criscito yet.