Atalanta 1 – Juventus 3: Break Out The Egg Nog
By: roberto | December 21st, 2008Well that was fun. Horrible pitch, some bad challenges, and a few sketchy incidences. All in all, I think our guys did a good job away in Bergamo and deserved the three points here. Atalanta looked quite threatening after Vieri’s goal but we managed to hold our back line nicely and regain some valuable possession. Ranieri got his Christmas present early as Juventus keep pace with Intermerda at the top of the table as the fat man rolls into town and we take a break for the holidays.
Anyone here think Amauri’s heading ability alone is worth his +€20 million price tag? I mean the man is unstoppable in the air. The more Lippi watches, the more he’ll realize what he stands to gain. Especially since Ranieri loves wing play and Marchionni and De Ceglie keep pumping in those accurate crosses. We can ride this strategy all year long… I feel like having some fish and chips all of a sudden. As alessio mentionned before, Marchionni is so great at making space for his crosses. Right foot or left, he’ll bend it in.
Legro got on the score sheet too with a nice header off of a corner. Great form by our centre-back throwing his ass into it ahahaha. Del Piero got one too off of a nice low searching cross by Marchionni who, after I reviewed the tape, was unfortunately in an offside position after Momo slid in a dirty through-ball. Thankfully Amauri’s header bailed us out though. Speaking of Momo, playing in Italy was a good move for him to grow his game. Look, he got nut-megged hard today for a great example of why it’s so important that you stay on your feet in Italy. He’ll need to keep this up or he’ll always have his doubters.
Ahhh what else? Here’s what I want for Christmas:
- Improved defending on set-pieces.
- More team discipline when we find ourselves stuck matching our opponent’s style of play.
- A healthy squad to start the new year.
So now we wait until the eleventh of January until we play Siena to kick off the second half of the season. It goes Siena, Lazio, Fiorentina, Udinese. Boy how important was it that we went into this break on a high note? Terribly so I think. Last season our title hopes were lost as we began the first couple months of the new year flat-footed. Thirteen points in the first nine games in fact. This year we can’t make the same mistake obviously. Ranieri needs to keep these guys in check over the break, maybe have a team Chris Cringle or something but then it’s back to two-a-days dammit.
IERI… OGGI… DOMANI… SEMPRE JUVE!!!
 |
Serie A Match Schedule |  |
 |
Discount Travel to Turin |
| Juventus Results |  | Stadio Olimpico information & hotels |
Category: Team News
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
      |
Comments
-
Nnahoj, bad idea. At the very least Juve need 4 strikers on the roster. We can’t get stuck with lower than that, not if we want to have the squad depth of a UEFA Champions League team. And as far as I’m concerned, Trezeguet stayed with us all the way through Serie B. He’s a hero in my eyes, and I know that goes the same for a lot of Juventini.
Regarding co-ownership, I think what adam said makes a lot of sense. Co-owning a player will indeed push the “buying” team to field him in the starting eleven (since they have money invested). In counterpart, the “selling” team ensures their player gets match experience and that his original (pre-agreed) market value does not drop if he plays badly or does not play at all during the “loan” stint.
Besides, according to the co-ownership modus operandi, the “selling” (i.e. the original) team is always favored in cases of sealed envelope bids.
Allow me to explain, and for the sake of simplicity let’s take the De Ceglie Juventus/Siena example:
1) Co-ownership deals last for about 1 year. At the end of said year, the two teams must agree on which one buys the other half of the player.
2) If the two teams cannot agree, then the player (De Ceglie) remains with the team that acquired his playing rights (Siena) for one more year.
3) At the end of the second year, the two teams must again agree on who buys the other half from the other. 4) If they still cannot agree, they make “sealed envelope” bids to the FA. That is, in the case of De Ceglie, Juventus and Siena would bid a certain amount of money which represents “what the club are ready to pay for the player”.
5) The team with the highest bid wins, and must pay that amount to the other team in order to keep the player.
6) Here’s the best part: if the two amounts are equal, the original team gets to keep the player.“Sealed envelope” bids is exactly what happened for Enzo Maresca and Fabrizio Miccoli. In both cases Moggi was able to
bribe FA representatives to find out what the rival club offeredbid just enough over the offers of Fiorentina to get the two players (who were then sold for a higher amount to Sevilla and Palermo) back to Juve for really cheap. Fiorentina got shafted, because they had offered peanuts for Maresca (€500 -that’s five hundred, not five hundred thousand!- compared to Juve’s €7,000) and zero for Miccoli (obviously, they had hoped Juve would offer more, but instead Moggi got away with buying the player for a mere €2.4m). In other words, Miccoli and Maresca returned to us for the misery of €2,407,000 combined.In contrast, the other half of Chiellini (who was also in co-ownership loan to La Viola) was bought back by Juve for the pre-established amount, namely €800k. Still pretty cheap for someone who would turn into one of the world’s top center-backs, don’t you think?
Posted from
Italy
-
Clubs can agree to continue the co-ownership situation, correct?
Posted from
United States -
By the way, Marco has a great write-up over at mcalcio about Juve-Chelski. (as well as Roma-Arsenal and ManYoo-Inter) Pop over and give it a read.
http://www.mcalcio.com/uefa-champions-league-playoffs-a-preliminary-look-at-our-epl-opponents/Posted from
United States -
I don’t think so alessio. The maximum duration is two years, after which an agreement has to be made on who retains the player.
With that said, I don’t think anything’s stopping the two clubs from making another co-ownership agreement (just like the previous one) right afterwards. I’m not 100% sure on this though.
By the way, I forgot to mention this but at any one time during the co-ownership agreement, one of the teams may offer to buy full ownership of the player. The other club has to accept however.
Posted from
Italy -
And the winner is……. Cristian Molinaro! The fullback played for 3,694 minutes, more then anyone else this year. Go figure.
Posted from
United States -
Marco, do you really think we need 4 strikers? Throughout the season so far we’ve been operating with just three and there haven’t been any problems so far. Personally, I think selling Trez, while in some ways would be advisable, would be too problematic to be feasible. Consider that a) He’s pretty old and hasn’t played in a while (i.e. no form) and b) as others have mentioned, by sticking with us through the Serie B years he’s gained an even more legendary status among Juventinos. Given the lack of potential buyers and his status with the club it would be hard to sell.
Instead, I would argue we could more greatly profit from selling Iaquinta to Roma, Tottenham, or really any interested club. As a younger player he’s bound to have more admirers and the fact that Amauri has been playing so consistently will really make it hard for Iaquinta to get any playing time. It’s not that I don’t like him, Iaquinta’s had some great games with us but through his lack of playing time and that atrocious miss at the end of the game against Milan he hasn’t done much to help the case for keeping him. It would be really great if we could sell him for another player, ideally Mordic from Tottenham (though I suspect there’s not much in that rumor). Finally, we still have Seba to play as a striker and so in fact would keep 4 strikers if we were to offload Iaquinta.
Why shouldn’t we sell Iaquinta?
Posted from
United States -
Because I like him.
No, seriously, if he is content with his position, I don’t see why he shouldn’t stay. He’s been terribly useful as an off-the-bench goal-getter. 4 strikers are important. It’s the same case as not having bought Amauri, imagine if Trez suffers a relapse and we sell Iaquinta in the winter mercato. That means Amauri-ADP pretty much have to play every game.
Posted from
United States -
This is true, it seems as if Ranieri prefers to save Giovinco for the forward position, so it is kind of like we have 5 already. Interesting side of things.
Posted from
United States -
Liverpool 39-0 Juventus
Posted from
United States -
Selling Iaquinta would be a very good idea, he’s basically wasting his career by sticking with us. He was a starter at Udinese and now is 4th string striker with us. I really don’t see why he hasn’t requested a transfer. I think that he has given us all that he can and its time for him to move on to another club where he can get more than 5 min each game.
Posted from
United States -
I just have to post this video, what a fucking clown,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBUaZK3A55E
Posted from
United States -
Haha who was that against?
I feel similarly about Iaquinta……but I love him, and I think he loves Juventus. That’s why he hasn’t moved on since. But he deserves more playing time, no doubt.
Posted from
United States -
I’m not sure, all I can see is MAN 2 – EUR 1.
I swear if I were the defender I would of just pointed and laughed at him so hard.
Posted from
United States -
There is no doubt that Iaquinta is attached to this shirt, he’s been a sub and hasen’t complained once. Last season Palladino was starting over him and he said nothing. Once he started over Palladino, Palladino starts complaining only to have Ranieri shut him up by saying that Iaqunta has had less playing time then him.
Posted from
United States -
Yo kids…
Guess who had the “buy” of the summer?
http://www.channel4.com/sport/football_italia/blogs/si24.html
Posted from
United States -
Lorenzo, without checking out the link I’m just gonna go out on a limb and say Inter with the Quaresma signing. Now to check the link…
Damn, I was wrong.
Posted from
United States -
So do you guys really think that Ranieri will be able to keep Trezeguet and Amauri happy? Because he hasn’t been rotating any positions on the squad so far. I doubt he would start all of a sudden when Trez comes back.
Posted from
United States -
Lorenzo… check this out
http://www.channel4.com/sport/football_italia/blogs/al75.html
Posted from
United States -
Yeah, I think it’s a bit ironic that he’s got the nickname Tinkerman but he clearly likes to stick with the same formation and players.
Posted from
United States -
Yea, he always says that he’ll “chose the formation the night before the game”, and it’s the same formation and players as the week before, unless someone is injured.
Posted from
United States -
Roberto – what was it? I keep getting a holding page saying channel4 is undergoing maintenance…
Posted from
United States -
If Amauri is now on the verge of representing Italy then we shouldn’t blame the player himself. We shouldn’t hold Azzurri boss Marcello Lippi responsible either. There is one culprit and his name is Carlos Dunga. His job? To supposedly lead Brazil to world football domination. The former Fiorentina hard man’s refusal to give Amauri his first international call-up is a managerial faux pas of incompetent proportions. Not only would his inclusion undoubtedly be of some value to his Selecao side, but it would also rule out the possibility of the big Brazilian defecting to a rival country.
Amauri again showed on Sunday night just what a quality player he is with a brace against Milan. While Dunga could have used the small club excuse while he was banging in the goals for Palermo, the 28-year-old’s move to Juventus has given the striker a stage big enough to prove his worth. Yet Dunga has continued to snub the former Chievo man in favour of the likes of Inter’s troubled Adriano. Surely the November friendly against Portugal would have been an ideal opportunity to just have a look at the Old Lady’s newest star? Apparently not.
Brazil may have scored six past the sorry Portuguese on that night, but Dunga netted one colossal own goal. He left Amauri on the international transfer market and it could come back to haunt him – perhaps as soon as the February London test against Italy. With reports on Tuesday suggesting that Amauri is edging closer to the Italian paperwork he requires, it would be no real surprise if a player who is so desperate for international football swears allegiance to La Nazionale.
It may not ethically be right, but if the rules will allow Amauri to wear Italy blue then Lippi – whose job is to retain the World Cup – will do what Dunga has incredibly refrained from. And if that happens, on purely footballing terms at least, it will be Brazil’s loss and Italy’s gain.
-Channel4
Posted from
United States -
The dude who wrote this nailed it right on I thought.
Posted from
United States -
Agreed – I read that a couple days ago – it’s spot on.
Posted from
United States -
Ravi, for a Champions League squad having at least 4 strikers in a 2-striker formation is an absolute must. That’s what I’m talking about when I mention “squad depth”: players who can come off the bench and be at least as good as the players coming off. There is just no way we can survive with 3 strikers, because in the event of an injury, we’re stuck with fielding the same two players all the way till the end of the season.
Concerning the Amauri-Dunga issue, I actually read some bad news (vis-a-vis Italy fans) in Gazzetta today, namely that the Brazilian manager may be ready to call our striker up in the next international friendlies. Dunga still says however that he “will not be bullied into making Amauri a starter right away”, and that the player’ll have to fight for his place in the team.
http://www.gazzetta.it/Calcio/Primo_Piano/2008/12/24/dunga.shtmlIf you ask me, I don’t think Amauri ever expected to be a starter in the Brazilian team. Just that Dunga opened his fu**ing eyes and recognize a growing talent. Now that he did, what I’m worried about is that a big door has just been opened for Amauri towards becoming an Auriverde. Now that’s something which was never clearly defined before, hence all the talking concerning a possible Azzurri call-up.
Until now.
I really wish the Italian bureaucrats would just hurry with the paperwork.
Posted from
Italy
Read the rest of the comments
Comments are closed
Home 
