Comments on: Amauri Travels To Torino, Maybe This Can Work

By: R.J.

R.J. — Thu, 29 May 2008 03:12:23 +0000

Dario, getting nervous yet????

By: alessio

alessio — Thu, 29 May 2008 00:01:33 +0000

And he’s 100% Italian, which bans him for playing for the Selecao/Milan or ArgInter. Come to think of it, Roma has a bunch of Brazilians too.

By: Dario

Dario — Wed, 28 May 2008 22:55:01 +0000

Lanzafame is not eligible for social security, therefore he can’t go to Milan hahaha

By: Samuel (A.C.M)

Samuel (A.C.M) — Wed, 28 May 2008 13:31:59 +0000

i’d be glad to take lanzafame if you guys dont need him give him to milan on a loan we will play him in the primavera ha ha!

By: Arsen

Arsen — Wed, 28 May 2008 11:36:03 +0000

God, I can’t read anymore news about this guy, he comes or he doesn’t, anyway I can’t understand what do we need him for, we have the best attack in Italy, we have Palladino and Yaqinta, also a yang guy Castilia (he is too yang but still) my opinion is that we should not spent so much money in order to strengthen our attack which is already the best in Italy.

By: Steven

Steven — Wed, 28 May 2008 07:52:17 +0000

Let’s not forget that those 23 goals include half a season out with a knee-injury.

And Roberto, we really need Nocerino. The faster Guana gets out of Sicily, the better.

By: LorenzoRosanero

LorenzoRosanero — Wed, 28 May 2008 05:51:17 +0000

yeah, he played, but he still had plenty he could’ve complained about. i see your point but i honestly do not see Amauri as the type of player who will whine about playing time. he’s had to work hard to get where he is. im sure he knows nothing is handed to him on a silver platter at Juve either. he’ll win you guys over…

besides, Palladino and Giovinco aren’t the same type of attacker that Amauri is. Both those guys are more Del Piero-esque (yeah, maybe not a word but w/e lol). Amauri is more like Trezegol, but with more strength and control.

as for Lanzafame, let’s face it, only a select few Italians have ever made a name for themselves in the EPL, and i don’t see him being one of them. I think he has a better chance of returning to Juve if he plays with Palermo than West Ham. If he ends up going to the Hammers, you’ll never see him in bianconero again.

By: alessio

alessio — Wed, 28 May 2008 04:22:23 +0000

Lorenzo, but he played. The way I see it he won’t be a regular, and he will complain come the end of the season about not getting enough 1st team action. Iaquinta and Palladino have been remarkably patient considering their lack of playing time and better yet, not bitchy to the press. I don’t really see that from Amauri.

By: Edgar

Edgar — Tue, 27 May 2008 23:34:12 +0000

Del Piero, Trezeguet, Iaquinta, Palladino and Giovinco, five strikers. By the way people are making to much fuss about Lanzefame wanting West Ham, he knows that if he wants to play for the Black and Whites two seasons from now he is risking it by going on a co by palermo, meanwhile a move to West Ham will just be a loan he will be able to comeback after its done.

By: MIkeDG

MIkeDG — Tue, 27 May 2008 23:01:40 +0000

am i the only one that thinks we DON’T need Amauri because we have Palladino? Play Raffa in his natural position, as a striker sub and NOT a wing, and give the boy a chance.

Next season we could have Del Piero, T-rez, Giovinco, Iaquinta, and Palladino as a rotating upfront squad. That’s not good enough for both the season and champs league?

We should spend cash on mid and defense, not forwards.